Skip to main content

Selected Validation Across Tasks, Participants, and EEG Configurations

InnoBrain’s Human Cognitive Monitoring platform has been evaluated across multiple independent datasets, cognitive tasks, EEG devices, and recording environments.

Our validation studies include:

  • Controlled laboratory experiments
  • High-fidelity driving simulators
  • Full-scalp, reduced-channel, and in-ear EEG
  • Multiple EEG hardware configurations
  • Previously unseen participants and tasks

 Links to the complete studies and publications are included in each section.

EEG Signal Cleaning

InnoBrain’s proprietary cleaning algorithm detects and reduces ocular, muscular, cardiac, movement-related, and environmental artifacts before cognitive-state analysis.

Validated against expert manual annotations

 

Metric Result
Recall 91%
Precision 81%

The algorithm has been evaluated across laboratory, simulator, and wearable EEG recordings.

Explore the cleaning algorithm validation

Mental Workload: CORTEX™

The CORTEX™ model series continuously estimates changes in mental workload from EEG.

CORTEX-O

The model was trained using a controlled arithmetic dataset and evaluated through Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation.

Laboratory results

  • 20 participants
  • 21-channel dry EEG
  • 75.4% classification accuracy

Cross-Task Driving Simulator Validation

To demonstrate cross-task generalization, the same model was applied, without driving-specific retraining, to 64 simulator recordings from 32 previously unseen participants across underload and overload driving conditions using a different 8-channel EEG configuration.

The model detected significantly higher workload during the more demanding driving condition, consistent with NASA-TLX assessments.

This evaluation demonstrates generalization across participants, tasks, and EEG configurations.

Explore the CORTEX-O validation

CORTEX-O2

CORTEX-O2 was evaluated using an arithmetic dataset involving 20 participants.

 

Metric Result
ROC AUC 0.81
F1 score 0.85
Balanced accuracy 0.82

The model also showed a graded workload response as arithmetic difficulty increased:

Easy: 0.39 → Medium: 0.53 → Hard: 0.69

Explore the arithmetic task validation

Cross-Task Stroop Validation

CORTEX-O2 was additionally applied to a separate Stroop dataset involving 20 participants, without Stroop-specific training.

The model identified the highest proportion of high-workload EEG windows during the learning of new task rules and the 50% incongruent condition phases. These findings demonstrate sensitivity to both rule acquisition and cognitive interference in a previously unseen task.

Explore the Stroop validation

Fatigue Spectrum™: DRIFT-O™

DRIFT-O™ monitors the neurological progression across the Fatigue Spectrum™:

Alert → Fatigued → Drowsy → Sleep Onset

The model has been evaluated using scalp EEG, reduced-channel simulator recordings, and wearable in-ear EEG.

 

Validation Setting Evaluation Data ROC AUC F1 score Balanced accuracy
Scalp EEG, Laboratory PVT 23 participants 0.90 0.87 0.88
Scalp EEG, cross-task driving simulator validation 102 datasets from 34 participants 0.88 0.74 0.76
In-ear EEG, Laboratory PVT 18 participants 0.93 0.95 0.94

The cross-task driving simulator validation included three driving environments:

  • Highway
  • Country roads
  • City driving

It also included varying EEG devices, channel configurations, and higher operational noise than controlled laboratory studies.

The in-ear study demonstrated that DRIFT-O can detect fatigue-related neural changes using a minimally intrusive wearable EEG configuration.

Explore the scalp EEG validation
Explore the simulator validation
Explore the in-ear EEG validation

Designed for Generalization

Across these studies, InnoBrain models have been evaluated for:

  • Subject generalization: Testing on previously unseen participants
  • Task generalization: Training on one task and applying the model to another
  • Hardware robustness: Evaluation across different EEG devices and channel configurations
  • Environmental robustness: Testing across laboratories, simulators, and wearable settings

Additional Metrics

InnoBrain’s broader monitoring platform also includes:

Calmness · Situational Awareness · Stress · Concentration · Motion Sickness

These metrics are grounded in established EEG and cognitive-neuroscience research, with additional validation studies ongoing.

 

Model Robustness & Generalization Recording Configurations
Cross-Task Subject-Independent Scalp EEG In-Ear EEG
CORTEX-O
CORTEX-O2
DRIFT-O

✓ Validated  — Not currently demonstrated